EU AI Act Article 50: What the AI Labeling Rules Mean for Creators
Article 50 has applied since 2 August 2026. What AI providers must mark, what deepfake publishers must disclose, and what the Code of Practice adds.
The people who build BlankAI
In This Article
- 01Providers must mark AI output
- 02Deployers must disclose deepfakes
- 03The Code of Practice
- 04What is exempt
- 05What it means in practice
The EU AI Act's transparency rules for AI-generated content became applicable on 2 August 2026. They mostly bind the companies that build AI systems, but one part applies to anyone who publishes deepfakes. This is a plain summary, not legal advice.
Providers must mark AI output
Article 50(2) requires providers of generative AI systems to mark synthetic audio, images, video and text in a machine-readable format so it can be detected as AI-generated. Fines can reach 15 million euros or 3% of worldwide turnover. The Digital Omnibus on AI, in force since late July 2026, gives systems already on the market before 2 August until 2 December 2026 to comply.
Deployers must disclose deepfakes
Article 50(4) is the part that reaches creators. If you use an AI system to generate or manipulate image, audio or video content that is a deepfake, meaning it resembles real people, places or events and could falsely appear authentic, you must disclose that it was artificially generated or manipulated. For evidently artistic, creative, satirical or fictional work, the disclosure can be made in a way that does not spoil the work.
The Code of Practice
The Commission's Code of Practice on transparency of AI-generated content was finalized on 10 June 2026. The first signatories, published on 31 July, included Google, OpenAI, Meta, Microsoft, Anthropic, Black Forest Labs, Mistral and others, and signing remains open. Its technical section asks providers to:
- use at least two marking layers: signed, timestamped metadata and an imperceptible watermark, with fingerprinting optional;
- offer free detection through a public specification, software or API;
- preserve existing markings and prohibit removing or tampering with them in their terms of service;
- not market or promote tools whose purpose is to circumvent markings;
- make watermark detection interoperable by 2 February 2027.
What is exempt
The Commission's guidelines of 20 July 2026 exempt assistive and standard editing that does not substantially alter content, among other cases. Resizing, format conversion and ordinary retouching are not what the marking duty is about.
What it means in practice
- Expect nearly all images from major AI services to carry both a manifest and a watermark by December 2026.
- Generator terms of service will prohibit removing those markings.
- If you publish realistic AI content that could pass as real, disclose it. Removing metadata does not change that duty.
- Removing personal metadata, such as GPS or device details, from your own photos is unaffected.
See what a file already carries before you publish it in the EU.
Inspect a fileSources
- Cooley: EU AI Act transparency obligations take effect (August 2026)
- White & Case: EU AI Omnibus enters into force
- European Commission: Code of Practice on transparency of AI-generated content
- European Commission: Strong backing for the Code of Practice (July 2026)
- European Commission: Guidelines on AI transparency obligations
- DLA Piper: What the EU's new Code of Practice means (July 2026)
Share this article
BlankAI Team
The people who build BlankAI
BlankAI builds browser-based tools for inspecting and cleaning image metadata. These guides are written by the same team, checked against vendor documentation, standards and independent tests, and updated when those change. Sources are listed at the end of each article. Corrections: [email protected].